A Parametric Study of the Dynamic Soil–Structure Interaction for Shear Vulnerable Structures with Nonlinear Finite Element Modelling

3Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In precedent years mostly, though rarely nowadays, shear deformable structures were constructed across the globe. Also, the soil is deformed as a shear cantilever, which means that the shear forces and stresses are more prominent than the respective normal forces and stresses; thus, the dynamic soil–structure interaction of shear deformable bodies is an important aspect to be researched. In this article, the dynamic soil–structure interaction of shear deformable structures is investigated through nonlinear finite element modelling. The goal of this work is to enlighten the qualitative response of both soil and structures, as well as the differences between the sole structure and the soil–structure system. The Athens 1999 earthquake accelerogram is used, which is considered as a palm load (which means a load that is not periodic like the Ricker wavelets), in order to enlighten the importance of the investigation of palm loading. It is demonstrated that the total displacements of the soil–structure system are larger than the case of the sole structure, as expected when taking into account the dynamic soil–structure interaction. However, the residual displacements of the top are larger when a moderate soil thickness is assumed. Moreover, the output acceleration functions over time, comparing the same buildings as the sole building and as the soil-building system, have the same time function, but they are amplified with a constant value. As a consequence, the critical time of the maximum energy flux that is transmitted to the building is not dependent on the dynamic soil–structure interaction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Savvides, A. A. (2024). A Parametric Study of the Dynamic Soil–Structure Interaction for Shear Vulnerable Structures with Nonlinear Finite Element Modelling. Geotechnics, 4(3), 693–717. https://doi.org/10.3390/geotechnics4030037

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free