Antibiotic prescribing in primary care by international medical graduates and graduates from Swedish medical schools

8Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background. Studies of antibiotic prescribing related to diagnosis comparing prescribers trained abroad with those trained in Sweden are lacking. Objectives. To determine whether general practices (GPs) and GP residents trained abroad had different prescribing patterns for antibiotics for common infections than those trained in Sweden using retrospective data from electronic patient records from primary health care in Kalmar County, Sweden. Methods. Consultations with an infection diagnosis, both with and without the prescription of antibiotics to 67 GPs and residents trained in Western Europe outside Sweden and other countries, were compared with a matched control group trained in Sweden. Results. For 1 year, 44 101 consultations of patients with an infection diagnosis and 16 276 prescriptions of antibiotics were registered. Foreign-trained physicians had 20% more visits compared with physicians trained in Sweden. The prescription of antibiotics per visit and physician in the respective groups, and independent of diagnosis, did not significantly differ between groups, when scaled down from number of consultations to number of prescribing physicians. Conclusions. There were minor and non-significant differences in antibiotic prescribing comparing GPs and residents trained abroad and in Sweden, most likely the result of an adaptation to Swedish conditions. Nevertheless, no group prescribed antibiotics in accordance to national guidelines. The results suggest that interventions are needed to reduce irrational antibiotic prescribing patterns, targeting all physicians working in Swedish primary health care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Neumark, T., Brudin, L., & Mölstad, S. (2015). Antibiotic prescribing in primary care by international medical graduates and graduates from Swedish medical schools. Family Practice, 32(3), 343–347. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmv001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free