How the Pro-Beijing Media Influences Voters: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment

0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Authoritarian regimes have increasingly leveraged foreign media to project influence within democracies, yet evidence of these co-opted outlets' actual effects remains scarce. This study presents findings from a field experiment conducted during Taiwan's 2020 general election, assessing the impact of The China Times, a Beijing-backed media conglomerate, on voter behavior and attitudes. The experiment incentivized participants to engage in sustained consumption of real-time news from this outlet in the weeks leading up to the election. Results from a panel survey linked to individual-level web-tracking data reveal that exposure to The China Times sways voters in favor of the People's Republic of China (PRC). These effects, however, are primarily driven by nonpartisan and PRC-friendly voters. To the extent that I find effects among PRC-skeptics, they show evidence of backfiring. As Beijing's media co-optation extends beyond Taiwan, my findings have broader implications for understanding the effectiveness and limitations of authoritarian influence operations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kao, J. C. (2026). How the Pro-Beijing Media Influences Voters: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment. American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055426101476

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free