Father-infant synchrony and infant vagal tone as an index of emotion regulation: father-infant shared times in Switzerland as moderators

2Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Research has shown that the quality of mother-infant interactions, as measured by mother-infant synchrony, is associated with infants’ vagal tone, a physiological indicator of emotion regulation. However, little is known about the association between the infant’s vagal tone and the quality of father-infant interactions. Existing literature suggests that the greater quantity of time a father spends with the infant, either alone (dyadic time) or with others (social time) may strengthen this association. In this study we investigated the association between father-infant synchrony and infants’ vagal tone in 77 dyads made up of fathers and their 3-month-old infants, considering the moderating roles of dyadic time and social time. Results revealed no direct associations between father-infant synchrony and infants’ vagal tone. Moderation analyses revealed that more social time increases the association between synchrony and vagal tone. This result indicates a potential influence of family interactive processes. Key findings Father-infant synchrony is not associated with infants’ vagal tone in father-infant interactions. The time that fathers share with infants facilitates associations between father-infant synchrony and infants’ vagal tone during father-infant interactions. Further investigations should explore whether interactive processes during shared family time influence dyadic father-infant interactions and the infant’s physiological emotion regulation at 3 months.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Puglisi, N., Tissot, H., Rattaz, V., Epiney, M., Razurel, C., & Favez, N. (2023). Father-infant synchrony and infant vagal tone as an index of emotion regulation: father-infant shared times in Switzerland as moderators. Early Child Development and Care, 193(15–16), 1714–1727. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2023.2274287

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free