Engine Combustion System Optimization Using Computational Fluid Dynamics and Machine Learning: A Methodological Approach

66Citations
Citations of this article
100Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Gasoline compression ignition (GCI) engines are considered an attractive alternative to traditional spark-ignition and diesel engines. In this work, a Machine Learning-Grid Gradient Ascent (ML-GGA) approach was developed to optimize the performance of internal combustion engines. ML offers a pathway to transform complex physical processes that occur in a combustion engine into compact informational processes. The developed ML-GGA model was compared with a recently developed Machine Learning-Genetic Algorithm (ML-GA). Detailed investigations of optimization solver parameters and variable limit extension were performed in the present ML-GGA model to improve the accuracy and robustness of the optimization process. Detailed descriptions of the different procedures, optimization tools, and criteria that must be followed for a successful output are provided here. The developed ML-GGA approach was used to optimize the operating conditions (case 1) and the piston bowl design (case 2) of a heavy-duty diesel engine running on a gasoline fuel with a research octane number (RON) of 80. The ML-GGA approach yielded >2% improvements in the merit function, compared with the optimum obtained from a thorough computational fluid dynamics (CFD) guided system optimization. The predictions from the ML-GGA approach were validated with engine CFD simulations. This study demonstrates the potential of ML-GGA to significantly reduce the time needed for optimization problems, without loss in accuracy compared with traditional approaches.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Badra, J. A., Khaled, F., Tang, M., Pei, Y., Kodavasal, J., Pal, P., … Aamir, F. (2021). Engine Combustion System Optimization Using Computational Fluid Dynamics and Machine Learning: A Methodological Approach. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Transactions of the ASME, 143(2). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047978

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free