Inflammatory Markers in Suction Blister Fluid: A Comparative Study Between Interstitial Fluid and Plasma

31Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Biomarker analysis allows for the detection and prediction of disease as well as health monitoring. The use of interstitial fluid (ISF) as a matrix for biomarkers has recently gained interest. This study aimed to compare levels of inflammatory markers in ISF from suction blister fluid (SBF) and plasma. Methods: Plasma and SBF were collected from 18 healthy individuals. Samples were analyzed for 92 inflammation-related protein biomarkers by Proximity Extension Assay (PEA). Protein profiles in the two matrices were compared using traditional and multivariate statistics. Results: Out of 92 targeted proteins, 70 were successfully quantified in both plasma and SBF. Overall, plasma and SBF displayed distinct protein profiles with up to 40-fold difference in abundance of specific proteins. The levels of 25 proteins were significantly correlated between plasma and SBF and several of these were recognized as potential markers to monitor health using ISF. Conclusions: Skin ISF and plasma have unique protein profiles but many inflammatory markers are proportionally related between the matrices at the individual level. ISF is a promising biofluid for the monitoring of biomarkers in clinical studies and routine analyses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sjöbom, U., Christenson, K., Hellström, A., & Nilsson, A. K. (2020). Inflammatory Markers in Suction Blister Fluid: A Comparative Study Between Interstitial Fluid and Plasma. Frontiers in Immunology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.597632

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free