Ice Storage Versus Perfusion for Preservation of Kidneys Before Transplantation

30Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The results of simple ice storage and prolonged perfusion storage of kidneys were compared in two series, each of 100 cadaver kidney transplants. There was a similar warm ischaemia time for both groups, but the average total storage time was 17 hours for the perfused kidneys as compared to three and a half hours for those stored in ice. The results of transplantation (as shown by transplant function at three and 12 months) were the same for both groups. There was no evidence of damage due to prolonged perfusion. The extra time, however, enabled a more convenient operation time to be chosen and more extensive tissue matching to be undertaken. © 1974, British Medical Journal Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scott, D. F., Whiteside, D., Redhead, J., & Atkins, R. C. (1974). Ice Storage Versus Perfusion for Preservation of Kidneys Before Transplantation. British Medical Journal, 4(5936), 76–77. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.4.5936.76

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free