Study on the Fatigue Bending Strength of Cylindrical Components Manufactured by External WAAM

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study investigates the fatigue bending strength, measured as the Mean of Fatigue Cycles (N), of cylindrical components produced by external wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) through a Taguchi L25 orthogonal array and linear regression analysis. Five welding parameters—welding current (Ampe), offset distance (mm), step length (mm), welding speed (mm/min), and specimen gauge diameter (mm)—were evaluated to maximize N using signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios. Nominal bending stresses (σ) ranged from 45 to 54 MPa, ANOVA on raw replicate data (25 runs, 3 replicates) confirmed specimen gauge diameter = 17 mm and weld current = 125 A as dominant, with F = 171.62 (p < 0.001, eta2 = 0.62 [95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.55–0.68]) for specimen gauge diameter and F = 6.13 (p < 0.001, eta2 = 0.13 [95% CI 0.08–0.18]) for weld current, accounting for ~75% of the variance. Optimal settings (offset distance = 3.0 mm, step length = 1000 mm, welding speed = 550 mm/min, specimen gauge diameter = 17 mm) achieved S/N = 111.35 dB, predicting N ≈ 350,000–380,000 cycles, a 22–33% improvement. Interactions between specimen gauge diameter and speed, and between weld current and offset distance, suggested enhanced strength at speed = 400–450 mm/min for specimen gauge diameter = 17 mm. Basquin’s law (b ≈ 0.72, R2 = 0.992) confirmed weld current as key. The linear regression model (adjusted R2 = 0.9506) had coefficients for specimen gauge diameter (+70,120 cycles/mm, p < 0.001) and weld current (+1088 cycles/Ampe, p = 0.02), but lower test R2 = 0.7212 via cross-validation (60/20/20 split) indicates overfitting due to small dataset size (25 runs), suggesting larger datasets or nonlinear models (e.g., polynomial regression, RSM). Confirmation runs (N = 317,082, 95% CI [287,000–347,000]) validated the results within ~13% error. WAAM reaches 80–90% of traditional manufacturing (TM) fatigue performance, with a 10–20% gap due to the microstructure; recommendations include post-treatments and safety factors (~1.2).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nguyen, V. M., Minh, P. S., Phan, D. T. T., & Toan, H. D. S. (2025). Study on the Fatigue Bending Strength of Cylindrical Components Manufactured by External WAAM. Materials, 18(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18204791

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free