A comparison of soybean maturity groups for phenology, seed yield, and seed quality components between eastern Ontario and southern Manitoba

12Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The expansion of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production onto the Canadian Prairies has resulted in new environmental constraints that affect soybean phenology, seed yield, and seed quality. This study examined these factors for 10 soybean cultivars differing in maturity group (MG) rating from 000.9 to 1.3 in southern Manitoba (MB) and eastern Ontario (ON). Detailed climate and phenological data collected at both locations were used to explore the environmental factors and differences in measurements among MG and between locations. In MB, more time was spent in vegetative growth and less time developing flowers and seeds than in ON. The longer vegetative growth stage in MB resulted in more leaves produced on the main stem at flowering than in ON. The leaf appearance rate was consistent between locations and the rate of phenological development in the vegetative stage was greater in ON because of its warmer mean temperature and shorter photoperiod. In MB, seed yield was positively correlated with precipitation in all growth stages and had a strong correlation with precipitation during reproductive development. In ON, increasingly warmer temperatures during reproductive development had the greatest influence on seed yield, particularly in the seed development stage. This study is a baseline for soybean phenology, seed yield, and seed quality components for early MG and will aid in the optimization of soybean breeding and production in the Canadian Prairies.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ort, N. W. W., Morrison, M. J., Cober, E. R., McAndrew, D., & Lawley, Y. E. (2022). A comparison of soybean maturity groups for phenology, seed yield, and seed quality components between eastern Ontario and southern Manitoba. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 102(4), 812–822. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjps-2021-0235

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free