The evolution of process-based hydrologic models: Historical challenges and the collective quest for physical realism

272Citations
Citations of this article
571Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The diversity in hydrologic models has historically led to great controversy on the "correct" approach to process-based hydrologic modeling, with debates centered on the adequacy of process parameterizations, data limitations and uncertainty, and computational constraints on model analysis. In this paper, we revisit key modeling challenges on requirements to (1) define suitable model equations, (2) define adequate model parameters, and (3) cope with limitations in computing power. We outline the historical modeling challenges, provide examples of modeling advances that address these challenges, and define outstanding research needs. We illustrate how modeling advances have been made by groups using models of different type and complexity, and we argue for the need to more effectively use our diversity of modeling approaches in order to advance our collective quest for physically realistic hydrologic models.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clark, M. P., Bierkens, M. F. P., Samaniego, L., Woods, R. A., Uijlenhoet, R., Bennett, K. E., … Peters-Lidard, C. D. (2017). The evolution of process-based hydrologic models: Historical challenges and the collective quest for physical realism. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21(7), 3427–3440. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3427-2017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free