Understanding faculty and student beliefs about teamwork & communication skills

31Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Strong communication and teamwork skills remain essential for engineering graduates in both academic and industry settings. They are considered by ABET to be key student learning outcomes for accreditation and are consistently high on employers list of necessary skills for new hires. Despite recognition of their importance, gaps in teaching these skills persist. While extensive research on communication pedagogy exists, teamwork suffers from a dearth of research on effective pedagogies. Regardless of existing research suggesting the significance, relatively few engineering courses integrate communication and teamwork skills. Our three-year mixed methods study grounded in motivation theory seeks to explore faculty and student beliefs about teamwork and communication, and to close the critical gaps between knowledge, belief, and practice. This paper focuses on outcomes from Phase1, which included 50 interviews with faculty from civil, mechanical and industrial/system engineering. We address the research question: How do faculty believe they are teaching teamwork and communication skills? Our findings suggest faculty approach teaching teamwork and communication differently. They typically have more structured definitions of good communication skills and, similarly, more structured strategies for teaching communication skills. In comparison, the interviews revealed less structured ways of talking about good teamwork skills and more ad hoc ways of teaching such skills. © 2012 American Society for Engineering Education.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matusovich, H. M., Paretti, M. C., Motto, A. M., & Cross, K. J. (2012). Understanding faculty and student beliefs about teamwork & communication skills. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22151

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free