Ontological Diversity in Theoretical Physics and Its Significance for Consciousness Research

2Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Many modern theories of consciousness seek to be consistent with prevailing scientific theories of the physical. While ontological flexibilities and current uncertainties in physical laws permit many options, it remains valuable to monitor evolving scientific thinking, generating new constraints and ideas for consciousness research. A structured literature review identifies 24 distinct ontological positions regarding theoretical physics. Significant variety exists across them, partially captured along eight axes: Substrate perspective; Property ontology; Property plurality; Dimensional ontology; Dimensional plurality; Allowed interactions; World plurality; and Intuition rejection, e.g. which intuitions of classical mechanics they are willing to drop. We identify three main implications for consciousness theorists: (i) three strategies for maintaining an ‘enlightened agnosticism’ about physical ontologies; (ii) a default weakening of ontologically-grounded arguments, alongside a strategy for bolstering them; (iii) an exploitable parallel between physical ontologies and philosophy of mind concerning intuition prioritization, leading to potential cross-disciplinary collaboration. We close by suggesting ways this work could be extended and made more useful to consciousness researchers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Percy, C., & Parra-Hinojosa, A. (2025). Ontological Diversity in Theoretical Physics and Its Significance for Consciousness Research. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 32(9–10), 183–214. https://doi.org/10.53765/20512201.32.9.183

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free