Efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for labor pain reduction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Labor pain is often managed with pharmacological interventions, which can lead to several adverse effects for mothers and neonates. Consequently, non-pharmacological interventions are gaining attention as safer alternatives for pain relief during labor. This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of non-pharmacological methods in reducing labor pain. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases up to September 2024. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating non-pharmacological interventions for labor pain relief were included, with pain intensity during cervical dilatation as the primary outcome. Data synthesis was performed using RevMan (V5.3). Seventy-seven RCTs involving 8,805 pregnant women were analyzed. The results indicated that non-pharmacological methods significantly reduced pain at 3-4 cm cervical dilatation compared to control groups (M.D. =-1.63, 95% C.I. [-2.05 to-1.21], P < 0.0001). Notably, subgroup analysis showed that body acupressure (M.D. =-2.08, 95% C.I. [-2.76 to-1.40], P < 0.0001) and foot reflexology (M.D. =-2.48, 95% C.I. [-2.84 to-2.13], P < 0.0001) were particularly effective. High heterogeneity (I² > 90%) was noted, partly reflecting differences in intervention types, protocols, and participant characteristics. Overall, non-pharmacological interventions provided substantial relief in labor pain compared to standard care, suggesting their potential utility in obstetric practice. Further large-scale studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mohammed, A. A., Hazazi, Z. H., Alhumaidi, B. N., Alanezi, S., Alshammari, F., Alobaidly, A., … Fadlalmola, H. A. (2025, November 15). Efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for labor pain reduction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. African Journal of Reproductive Health . Women’s Health and Action Research Centre. https://doi.org/10.29063/ajrh2025/v29i10.21

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free