Comparative effectiveness of a bilayered living cellular construct and an acellular fetal bovine collagen dressing in the treatment of venous leg ulcers

14Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of bilayered living cellular construct (BLCC) and an acellular fetal bovine collagen dressing (FBCD) for the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Methods: Data from WoundExpert® (Net Health, PA, USA) was used to analyze 1021 refractory venous leg ulcers treated at 177 facilities. Results: Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that BLCC (893 wounds) was superior to FBCD (128 wounds), p = 0.01 for: wound closure by weeks 12 (31 vs 25%), 24 (55 vs 43%) and 36 (68 vs 53%); reduction in time to wound closure of 37%, (19 vs 30 weeks); and improvement in the probability of healing by 45%. Conclusion: BLC versus FBCD showed significant differences in both time to and frequency of healing suggesting that BLCC may provide significant cost savings compared with FBCD.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sabolinski, M. L., & Gibbons, G. (2018). Comparative effectiveness of a bilayered living cellular construct and an acellular fetal bovine collagen dressing in the treatment of venous leg ulcers. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 7(8), 797–805. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2018-0031

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free