The use of life satisfaction diagrams and biographical grids as hybrid tools for the collection of sequential data

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article describes the characteristics of two types of hybrid tools that are useful for obtaining both quantitative and qualitative data. It reviews how these tools have been used in previously published studies and identifies the advantages and disadvantages of their use. The two types of tools in question are life satisfaction diagrams and biographical grids. Both types of diagrams were originally designed as instruments for obtaining quantitative data within life course research, and later came to be used as either hybrid tools or only as qualitative tools. Both types of diagrams are evaluated mainly on the use made by the author in studies in which he has participated. The main advantages identified can be sum-marised in two points: (1) the ease of obtaining an accurate representation of complex facts and (2) the opportunity for this representation to stimulate personal reflection. One main limitation common to both diagrams has been identified: they can be difficult to understand unless interviewees receive a clear explanation. This type of diagrams can be seen as a bridge between the life course perspective and mixed methods research, a combination that has been seldom addressed in the methodological literature.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Verd, J. M. (2022). The use of life satisfaction diagrams and biographical grids as hybrid tools for the collection of sequential data. Papers, 107(4). https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.3089

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free