Retrieval latency and 'at-risk' memories

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Does retrieval latency reflect variations in the strength of associations in episodic memory? In three experiments, subjects were given a single study and test trial on each of five lists of 10 paired associates. Spoken recall latencies were measured. When the subjects were later given a second test, initial recall latency was systematically related to intertest retention - that is, the faster the initial correct recall of a pair, the more likely a pair was to be recalled at the second test. This effect occurred at retention intervals of 5 min, 30 min, and 24 h and was present in the data for individual subjects. The results are consistent with the classical view of latency as a measure of trace strength and stand in sharp contrast with results reported by Benjamin, Bjork, and Schwartz (1998) that showed that fast retrievals from semantic memory were more poorly retained than slower ones.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Madigan, S., Neuse, J., & Roeber, U. (2000). Retrieval latency and “at-risk” memories. Memory and Cognition, 28(4), 523–528. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201242

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free