Locomotor activation and dopamine release produced by nicotine and isoarecolone in rats

66Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Isoarecolone was approximately 250 times less potent than nicotine as an inhibitor of [3H]‐nicotine binding to rat brain membranes. Isoarecolone failed to inhibit the binding of the nicotinic ligand [125I]‐α‐bungarotoxin or of the muscarinic ligand [3H]‐QNB. Nicotine (0.01–30 μm) evoked the release of [3H]‐dopamine from striatal and frontal cortex synaptosomes, with EC50 values of approximately 0.5 μM in each case. This release was largely mecamylamine‐sensitive. Isoarecolone (1–200 μm) evoked predominantly mecamylamine‐sensitive dopamine release from both striatal and cortical synaptosomes, with a potency at least 20 times less than that of nicotine. The maximum effect of isoarecolone was less than that of nicotine, particularly in the frontal cortex preparation. In control rats treated chronically with saline, neither nicotine nor isoarecolone had clear effects on locomotor activity at the doses tested. Chronic treatment with nicotine clearly sensitized rats to the locomotor activating effect of nicotine; there was only weak cross‐sensitization to isoarecolone. The maximum effect of isoarecolone was seen at a dose about 40 times larger than that of nicotine. The low potency and efficacy of isoarecolone in facilitating sensitized locomotor activity resembled its lower potency and efficacy, compared with nicotine, in evoking dopamine release in vitro. The agonist profile of the nicotinic receptor population mediating dopamine release may determine the pharmacological characteristics of consequent locomotor behaviour. 1995 British Pharmacological Society

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Whiteaker, P., Garcha, H. S., Wonnacott, S., & Stolerman, I. P. (1995). Locomotor activation and dopamine release produced by nicotine and isoarecolone in rats. British Journal of Pharmacology, 116(3), 2097–2105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1995.tb16417.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free