A heart transplant center experience with basiliximab induction strategies: A double edged sword?

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The use of induction immunosuppression for heart transplantation (HT) is debated given the uncertain benefit and potential risks of infection and malignancy. Methods: This is a retrospective single-center analysis of 475 consecutive HT recipients from 2003 to 2020 grouped by use of induction with basiliximab group (BG) and the no basiliximab group (NBG). Subgroup analysis by era compared pre-2016 standard-basiliximab (BX) induction and 2016–2020 with selective-BX use as part of a calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing regimen. Results: When adjusted for confounders (sex, age, PRA, eGFR), the BG was less likely to have acute cellular rejection (ACR) (OR.42, p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Holzhauser, L., Norris, M., Molina, M., Chambers, S., Sundaravel, S., Rashed, E., … Peyster, E. (2024). A heart transplant center experience with basiliximab induction strategies: A double edged sword? Clinical Transplantation, 38(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.15307

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free