Hypoxemia and reoxygenation with 21% or 100% oxygen in newborn pigs: Changes in blood pressure, base deficit, and hypoxanthine and brain morphology

109Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To study whether room air is as effective as 100% 02 in resuscitation after hypoxia, hypoxemia (Pao2 2.3-4.3 kPa) was induced in newborn pigs (2-5 d old) by ventilation with 8% 02 in nitrogen. When systolic blood pressure had fallen to 20 mm Hg, animals were randomly reoxygenated with either 21% 02 (group 1, n = 9) or 100% 02 (group 2, n = 11) for 20 min followed by 21% 02 in both groups. Controls (group 3, n — 5) were ventilated with 21% 02 throughout the experiment. Base deficit peaked at 31 ± 5 mmol/L (mean ± SD) for both hypoxic groups at 5 min of reoxygenation and then normalized over the following 3 h. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups during reoxygenation concerning blood pressure, heart rate, base deficit, or plasma hypoxanthine. Hypoxanthine peaked at 165 ± 40 and 143 ± 42 /imol/L in group 1 and 2 (NS), respectively, and was eliminated monoexponentially in both groups with an initial half-life for excess hypoxanthine of 48 ± 21 and 51 ± 27 min (NS), respectively. Blinded pathologic examination of cerebral cortex, cerebellum, and hippocampus after 4 d showed no statistically significant differences with regard to brain damage. We conclude that 21% 02 is as effective as 100% 02 for normalizing blood pressure, heart rate, base deficit, and plasma hypoxanthine after severe neonatal hypoxemia in piglets and that the extent of the hypoxic brain damage is similar in the two groups. © 1992 International Pediatric Research Foundation, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rootwelt, T., Løberg, E. M., Moen, A., Oyaster, S., & Saugstad, O. D. (1992). Hypoxemia and reoxygenation with 21% or 100% oxygen in newborn pigs: Changes in blood pressure, base deficit, and hypoxanthine and brain morphology. Pediatric Research, 32(1), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-199207000-00021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free