Clinical and economic impact of a switch from high- to low-volume renal replacement therapy in patients with acute kidney injury

6Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

High-intensity renal replacement therapy protocols in intensive care patients with acute kidney injury have failed to translate to improved patient outcomes when compared with lower-intensity protocols. This retrospective study explored the clinical and economic impacts of switching from a 30-35 ml.kg -1.h-1 (high-volume) to a 20 ml.kg-1.h -1 (low-volume) protocol. Patients (n = 366) admitted 12 months before (n = 187) and after (n = 179) the switch were included in the study. There was no difference in in-hospital mortality (77/187 (41%) vs 75/179 (42%), respectively, p = 0.92), intensive care unit mortality (55/187 (29%) vs 61/179 (34%), respectively, p = 0.40), duration of organ support or extent of renal recovery between the high- and low-volume cohorts. A 25% reduction in daily replacement fluid usage was observed, equating to a cost saving of over £27 000 per annum. In conclusion, a switch from high- to low-volume continuous haemodiafiltration had minimal effects on clinical outcomes and resulted in marked cost savings. © 2014 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Paterson, A. L., Johnston, A. J., Kingston, D., & Mahroof, R. (2014). Clinical and economic impact of a switch from high- to low-volume renal replacement therapy in patients with acute kidney injury. Anaesthesia, 69(9), 977–982. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12706

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free