Economic statecraft, geoeconomics and regional political economies

33Citations
Citations of this article
92Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this introduction to the special issue, we establish the overarching objective for the collection; to investigate the salience and efficacy of conceptions of Economic Statecraft (ES) and Geoeconomics for understanding and explaining shifts in state-market relationships in a number of regional political economies. After a very short overview of different generations of ES research, we establish the set of common questions that each of the papers address, and how we arrived at them as the research project evolved. We point to the importance of ensuring that ES is not just thought of as something that the more powerful regional states engage in, and the need to adopt a three-part analytical distinction between different components of ES: motivations and objectives; actions and tools; and outcomes and consequences. This allows us to trace the relationship between goals and effects, provides a basis for comparative studies, and makes it easier to make a distinction between ES and other forms of state involvement in the economy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Breslin, S., & Nesadurai, H. E. S. (2023). Economic statecraft, geoeconomics and regional political economies. Pacific Review, 36(5), 927–948. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2023.2200030

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free