Quantifying the balance between total bone formation and total bone resorption: An index of net bone formation

50Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Context: Bone gain vs loss across the skeleton loss depends on the balance between total bone formation and total bone resorption. Objective: The objective of the study was to determine whether resorption and formation markers can be combined to gauge net bone formation across the skeleton. Design: The study included a cohort followed up across menopause transition (Study of Women's Health Across the Nation). Setting and Participants: Community-dwelling women, 42-52 years old, premenopausal or early perimenopausal at baseline, participated in the study. Outcome: The study included the following measures: 1) bone balance index (BBI) created by estimating the relationship between resorption (urinary N-telopeptide) and formation (osteocalcin) markers when the total formation equals the total resorption in 685 women with stable bone mineraldensity(BMD)(β5ybeforethefinalmenstrualperiod[FMP])andapplyingthisrelationship to measured bone turnover markers in 216 women beginning to lose bone (2 y from FMP); and 2) annualized percentage declines over the following 3-4 years in the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) BMD. Results: Adjusted for covariates, the BBI was greater (more favorable) in women with a greater body mass index (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shieh, A., Han, W., Ishii, S., Greendale, G. A., Crandall, C. J., & Karlamangla, A. S. (2016). Quantifying the balance between total bone formation and total bone resorption: An index of net bone formation. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 101(7), 2802–2809. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-4262

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free