Neuroprotection and stroke: Time for a compromise

101Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In April 2007, there existed a repertory of 286 trials concerned with acute ischemic stroke on the Stroke Trials Registry (http://www.strokecenter.org/ trials/), of which 209 trials were considered as complete (with no evidence of patient benefit unless one considers the much hard fought for and modest results of the tPA studies). Among other questions arising from such failures, one can wonder whether the plethora of pharmacological agents that exhibited neuroprotective properties in pre-clinical studies were selected for clinical trials entirely based upon their experimental efficacy. This mini-review will try to point out some of the weaknesses that could underline the failure of both researchers and clinicians involved in the field of stroke to obtain their ultimate goal - brain protection. © 2007 The Authors.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Young, A. R., Ali, C., Duretête, A., & Vivien, D. (2007, November). Neuroprotection and stroke: Time for a compromise. Journal of Neurochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.04866.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free