Chandra X-Ray Observations of Radio-Loud Broad Absorption Line Quasars

  • Brotherton M
  • Laurent-Muehleisen S
  • Becker R
  • et al.
22Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We report the results of a Chandra X-Ray Observatory survey of five formally radio-loud broad absorption line (BAL) quasars. These five objects include BAL quasars with a range of properties, including both high- and low-ionization BALs. All five BAL quasars are detected in 5 ks ACIS-S exposures, with counts ranging from 12 to 55. The X-ray count rates are down by factors of 40 or more compared to expectations based on the spectral energy distributions of normal, unabsorbed radio-loud quasars; this is the same sort of behavior seen in radio-quiet BAL quasars. Interestingly, the hardness ratios are rather soft and inconsistent with absorption from a neutral hydrogen column density large enough to suppress the X-rays as observed. We conclude that in many cases the X-rays emanating from BAL quasars must be reflected, scattered, or leaked through an ionized absorber or a neutral absorber that does not completely cover the X-ray source (covering ≥98%), or that we are seeing an unabsorbed X-ray source perhaps associated with a radio jet. Much higher counts are required to distinguish among these possibilities. We note several suggestive correlations involving X-ray properties that require verification using larger samples. One source, FIRST J1556+3517, appears to be the X-ray brightest low-ionization BAL quasar known, other than the special case of the nearby Mrk 231. The very faint X-ray emission from FIRST J1044+3656 is consistent with significant obscuration, which strongly favors the multiphase X-ray shielding models of this object in the literature.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brotherton, M. S., Laurent-Muehleisen, S. A., Becker, R. H., Gregg, M. D., Telis, G., White, R. L., & Shang, Z. (2005). Chandra X-Ray Observations of Radio-Loud Broad Absorption Line Quasars. The Astronomical Journal, 130(5), 2006–2011. https://doi.org/10.1086/496948

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free