Effects of response selection on the task repetition benefit in task switching

47Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A task switch typically leads to worse performance than a repetition does. This shift cost can be reduced with sufficient task preparation time, but a residual cost usually remains. We propose that a large part of this residual cost is caused by an activation bias produced by response selection processes in the preceding trial. In our experiments, we manipulated response selection requirements using a go/no-go methodology. The residual shift cost disappeared after no-go trials, suggesting that response selection is crucial to establish an activation bias for the current category-response rules and that this bias persists into the next trial. A comparison with a go-only group confirmed this analysis by revealing no differences in preparatory strategy due to the inclusion of no-go trials. In addition, no-go trials had no significant effects on subsequent trials in a single-task experiment, suggesting that no-go trials are not coded as a task different from go trials and that there is no inhibition of the prepared task in a no-go trial. We thus conclude that a persisting activation bias of response rules plays a major role in task switching. Copyright 2005 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koch, I., & Philipp, A. M. (2005). Effects of response selection on the task repetition benefit in task switching. Memory and Cognition, 33(4), 624–634. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195329

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free