Differences in the effects of "Nordic Hamstring exercises" vs. "Eccentric Exercises" Protocols on Hamstring Strength in amateur soccer players universitary.

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Hamstring injuries have a high incidence in sports, so prevention through training is imperative. The effectiveness of different exercises is constantly sought and evaluated; especially eccentric exercises due to their protective effect. Objective: Compare and observe differences in Work and Peak Torque in the representation of Hamstring strength, through isokinetic dynamometry pre and post execution of eccentric training programs. Methodology: 2 groups of random training, both of which undergo isokinetic evaluation for hamstrings, at speeds of 60°/s and 180°/s bilaterally; Subsequently, a 6-week training was carried out; Group 1 (G1) performed a “Nordic Curl” (CN) training, and Group 2 (G2) an eccentric program (EE) excluding the CN, after the program they were re-evaluated. Results: Both training sessions showed significant differences (p<0.05) in average eccentric strength gain, but not in maximum repetitions (p>0.05). On the other hand, both trainings show large effect sizes. There were no significant differences between the workouts when comparing them in strength gain. Conclusion: The Nordic curl training program (G1) and eccentric exercises that exclude the CN (G2) have proven to be a viable option to generate neuromuscular adaptations that translate into eccentric strength gain and reduction in the risk of injury, thanks to the Optimization of functional ratios.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cancino-Jiménez, J., Tapia-Contreras, V., Nuñez-Coronado, O., Faúndez-Pozo, D., Retamal-Espinoza, M., Arriagada-Tarifeño, D., … Aedo-Muñoz, E. (2025). Differences in the effects of “Nordic Hamstring exercises” vs. “Eccentric Exercises” Protocols on Hamstring Strength in amateur soccer players universitary. Retos, 62, 295–303. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v62.107946

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free