Physico-chemical properties of calcium silicate-based sealers in powder/liquid and ready-to-use forms

16Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Calcium silicate-based root canal sealers have been developed in powder/liquid or premixed ready-to-use forms. The evaluation of the physicochemical properties of a prototype powder/liquid MTApex Sealer (Ultradent) in comparison to a ready-to-use material EndoSequence BC Sealer (Brasseler) was performed. The paste/paste epoxy resin-based AH Plus (Dentsply) served as control for comparisons. The sealers were evaluated (n = 6) regarding setting time (in dry and moist environments), flow and radiopacity, following the IS0-6876/2012 standard. Also, the pH was assessed. Material's surface and chemical characterization was evaluated using scanning-eleetron-mieroscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive-speetrometry (EDS). Mixed ANOVA, Shapiro-Wilk, Levene, and post-hoc analysis with Bonferroni correction were performed at a significance level of 5%. MTApex Sealer exhibited the highest flow and EndoSequence BC Sealer had a significantly longer setting time in dry compared to the moist environment; however, for MTApex Sealer and AH Plus no significant changes occurred when additional moisture was provided. All materials exceeded 7 mm Al of radiopacity and showed a decreasing alkalinity over the 21 day-analysis. SEM/EDS evaluation resulted in peaks of calcium, silicon, and the respective radiopacifier. The prototype powder/liquid MTApex Sealer had the highest flow and similar setting time in both dry and moist environments; opposingly, EndoSequence BC Sealer was crucially influenced by external moisture. This suggests that the powder/liquid materials' setting seems to be more predictable.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Janini, A. C. P., Pelepenko, L. E., Gomes, B. P. F. A., & Marciano, M. A. (2022). Physico-chemical properties of calcium silicate-based sealers in powder/liquid and ready-to-use forms. Brazilian Dental Journal, 33(5), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202204832

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free