La continencia de la causa vs. el libre desarrollo de la personalidad. El divorcio incausado en Veracruz

  • López Bonilla I
  • Zapata Durán M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

RESUMEN: La ecuación: diversidad de prestaciones - identidad de personas y cosas - un solo procedimiento - una sola sentencia, ha permanecido inamovible durante años en pretexto de la configuración de la continencia de la causa, sin la existencia de una norma que sustente la inflexibilidad con la que se ha aplicado. De cara al derecho humano al libre desarrollo de la personalidad, esta práctica reiterada debe doblegarse en favor del accionante del divorcio incausado, cuyo plan de vida se obstaculiza a causa de la inexorable búsqueda de una sola sentencia definitiva que resuelva las múltiples pretensiones con nexos a la disolución del vínculo matrimonial, sujetas a la temporalidad infructuosa del proceso. Por lo que, en el manuscrito, presentamos la carga argumentativa de contrapeso a lo expuesto por un órgano de control constitucional que, en su labor jurisdiccional, sobrepone la figura procesal de la continencia de la causa al ejercicio pleno del libre desarrollo de la personalidad.Palabras clave. Continencia de la causa, divorcio incausado, libre desarrollo de la personalidad, proceso civil, sentencia definitiva.ABSTRACT: The equation: diversity of legal benefits - personal and acts identity - a single procedure - only one verdict, it has been immovable for years under the pretext of shaping the continence of the cause, without the existence of a rule that supports the inflexibility with which it has been applied. In front to the human right to the free development of the personality, this reiterated practice must bend in favor of the plaintiff of the divorce without cause, whose life plan is hindered due to the inexorable search for a only one veredict that resolves all claims related to the dissolution of the marriage bond subject to the unsuccessful temporality of the process. Therefore, in this manuscript, we present the argumentative burden of counterbalance to the exposed by a constitutional control body that, in its jurisdictional work it imposes the procedural figure of the continence of the cause to the full exercise of the free development of the personality.Keywords. Continence of the cause, divorce without cause, free development of the personality, civil prosecution, definitive veredict.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

López Bonilla, I. U., & Zapata Durán, M. S. (2020). La continencia de la causa vs. el libre desarrollo de la personalidad. El divorcio incausado en Veracruz. Enfoques Jurídicos, (2), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.25009/ej.v0i2.2546

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free