Quality of life related to residual snoring after adenotonsillectomy: a pilot study

3Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Few studies have addressed long-term quality of life related to residual snoring after adenotonsillectomy. The aim of this study was to compare scores from the OSA-18 questionnaire between children with residual snoring and non-snoring children two or more years after adenotonsillectomy. Material and Methods: The sample comprised 25 children divided into two groups, a group of 14 snoring children, and a control group of 11 non-snoring children. The OSA-18 questionnaire was applied to the volunteers. In the control group, it was completed by the caregivers of the children, while in individuals with residual snoring it was completed by the caregivers of children in the presence of a doctor or dentist. A statistical comparison was made using a generalized linear model. Results: The snorer group had a higher total OSA-18 score, and a higher score in all five domains compared to the control group. Conclusion: Children with residual snoring two or more years after adenotonsillectomy may have a worse quality of life compared to the control group.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bariani, R. C. B., Guimaraes, T. M., Moura, W., Junior, M. C., Tufik, S., Moreira, G. A., & Fujita, R. R. (2021). Quality of life related to residual snoring after adenotonsillectomy: a pilot study. Sleep Science, 14(4), 330–336. https://doi.org/10.5935/1984-0063.20200093

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free