Extended anticoagulation after venous thromboembolism: should it be done?

14Citations
Citations of this article
43Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Most physicians understand venous thromboembolism (VTE) to be an acute and time-limited disease. However, pathophysiological and epidemiological data suggest that in most patients VTE recurrence risk is not resolved after the first 6 months of anticoagulation. Recurrence rates are high and potentially life-threatening. In these cases, it would make sense to prolong anticoagulation for an undetermined length of time. However, what about the bleeding rates, induced by prolonged anticoagulation? Would they not outweigh the benefit of reducing the VTE recurrent risk? How long should anticoagulation be continued, and should all patients suffering from VTE be provided with extended anticoagulation? This review will address the most recent data concerning extended anticoagulation in VTE secondary prophylaxis. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplementary material section.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fernandes, C. J., Calderaro, D., Piloto, B., Hoette, S., Jardim, C. V. P., & Souza, R. (2019). Extended anticoagulation after venous thromboembolism: should it be done? Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753466619878556

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free