Scientific integrity: Perceptions and recommendations from a qualitative study with actors of the science, technology, and innovation system in Colombia

0Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The review of the scientific literature has provided evidence of the presence of scientific misconduct and questionable conduct in research (QCR), without further studies in different countries, including Colombia. This study aims to provide results of qualitative research on the perceptions and recommendations associated with scientific integrity in the country. Interviews were conducted with researchers, peer reviewers, editors and research directors or managers of universities and research centers in the country. The results reveal the need to promote institutional policies and improve practices that help strengthen the national policy on scientific integrity. A strong correlation was also found between misconduct, lack of knowledge of authorship criteria, difficulties in peer review, research data management and the processes of research memory due to the pressure of the national research system and the institutions to meet goals within it.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bernal-Camargo, D. R., Trillos-Peña, C. E., Agudelo-Grajales, D., Bravo-Chamorro, J., Londoño-Calero, S. L., Barrios-Mendez, A. R., … Rodríguez-Torres, V. (2025). Scientific integrity: Perceptions and recommendations from a qualitative study with actors of the science, technology, and innovation system in Colombia. Research Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161251377473

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free