El final de una tensión esencial: Analíticos y continentales. hermenéutica filosófica y teorías de la argumentación

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The author presents the hypothesis that the foundations of the so-called speculative theories of argumentation are to be found in philosophical hermeneutics. To demonstrate the strength of this hypothesis the author explores the most famous historical thesis regarding the connection between analytical and continental thought. In addition, she also presents an analysis of concepts (plausibility, dialectic, rhetoric, heuristic reasoning, and reasoning topic) to show the hermeneutical basis of developments in the field of argumentation theories.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Navarro, M. G. (2010). El final de una tensión esencial: Analíticos y continentales. hermenéutica filosófica y teorías de la argumentación. Arbor, 186(742), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2010.742n1111

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free