MRA versus DSA for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: A meta-analysis

83Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

MR angiography is proposed as a safer and less expensive alternative to the reference standard, DSA, in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular coil occlusion. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of TOF-MRA and contrast-enhanced MRA in detecting residual flow in the follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms. Literature was reviewed through the PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE data bases. In comparison with DSA, the sensitivity of TOF-MRA was 86% (95% CI: 82-89%), with a specificity of 84% (95% CI: 81-88%), for the detection of any recurrent flow. For contrast-enhanced MRA, the sensitivity and specificity were 86% (95% CI: 82-89%) and 89% (95% CI: 85-92%), respectively. Both TOF-MRA and contrast-enhanced MRA are shown to be highly accurate for detection of any recanalization in intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular coil occlusion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Amerongen, M. J., Boogaarts, H. D., De Vries, J., Verbeek, A. L. M., Meijer, F. J. A., Prokop, M., & Bartels, R. H. M. A. (2014, September 1). MRA versus DSA for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Neuroradiology. American Society of Neuroradiology. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3700

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free