Utilizing network analysis to understand the structure of depression in Chinese adolescents: Replication with three depression scales

27Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Depression involves a heterogenous collection of symptoms. Network perspective views depressive symptoms as an interrelated network. The current study aimed to replicate network analyses on adolescent depression in three samples assessed with three instruments to examine the consistency of network structures and also examine the variance of networks between genders. Three samples of adolescents (total N = 4375, mean age = 15, 49.1% boys) were assessed with PHQ-9, SMFQ and CDI, respectively. Network analyses were carried out on depression symptoms. Network stability, node centrality and network comparisons between genders were examined. Three networks were reliably stable. Sadness and self-hatred were unanimously identified to be central symptoms of adolescent depression in three networks. In addition, fatigue, no good, everything wrong and loneliness also appeared to be central in specific networks. Among three depression networks, PHQ-9 network demonstrated gender difference in network structure. The current study is exploratory in nature. The differences in three networks can be due to various samples or different node inclusions. Further, the study is cross-sectional precluding causal interpretation and the samples are nonclinical. Besides “hallmark” symptom sadness, self-hatred was also identified unanimously in three networks, which demonstrated the significant role self-worth played in adolescent depression. The results also suggested that differences in node inclusion may have influence on the network structure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xie, T., Wen, J., Liu, X., Wang, J., & Poppen, P. J. (2023). Utilizing network analysis to understand the structure of depression in Chinese adolescents: Replication with three depression scales. Current Psychology, 42(25), 21597–21608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03201-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free