Mechanisms and diagnostic evaluation of persistent or recurrent angina following percutaneous coronary revascularization

150Citations
Citations of this article
108Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Persistence or recurrence of angina after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may affect about 20-40% of patients during short-medium-term follow-up. This appears to be true even when PCI is 'optimized' using physiology-guided approaches and drug-eluting stents. Importantly, persistent or recurrent angina post-PCI is associated with a significant economic burden. Healthcare costs may be almost two-fold higher among patients with persistent or recurrent angina post-PCI vs. those who become symptom-free. However, practice guideline recommendations regarding the management of patients with angina post-PCI are unclear. Gaps in evidence into the mechanisms of post-PCI angina are relevant, and more research seems warranted. The purpose of this document is to review potential mechanisms for the persistence or recurrence of angina post-PCI, propose a practical diagnostic algorithm, and summarize current knowledge gaps.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Crea, F., Bairey Merz, C. N., Beltrame, J. F., Berry, C., Camici, P. G., Kaski, J. C., … Shimokawa, H. (2019, August 1). Mechanisms and diagnostic evaluation of persistent or recurrent angina following percutaneous coronary revascularization. European Heart Journal. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy857

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free