Abstract
Given the distribution of one atmospheric variable, that of nearly all others can be derived in balanced flow. In particular, potential vorticity inversion (PVI) selects potential vorticity (PV) to derive pressure, winds, and potential temperature θ. Potential temperature inversion (PTI) starts from available θfields to derive pressure, winds, and PV. While PVI has been applied extensively, PTI has hardly been used as a research tool although the related technical steps are well known and simpler than those needed in PVI. Two idealized examples of PTI and PVI are compared. The 40-yr European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Re-Analysis (ERA-40) datasets are used to determine typical anomalies of PV and θin the North Atlantic storm-track region. Statistical forms of PVI and PTI are applied to these anomalies. The inversions are equivalent but the results of PTI are generally easier to understand than those of PVI. The issues of attribution and piecewise inversion are discussed. © 2010 American Meteorological Society.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Egger, J., & Hoinka, K. P. (2010). Potential temperature and potential vorticity inversion: Complementary approaches. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 67(12), 4001–4016. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAS3532.1
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.