Comparison of Debriefing Methods after a Virtual Simulation: An Experiment

75Citations
Citations of this article
175Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Numerous studies support debriefing after an in-person simulation experience. However, there is little understanding about effective debriefing methods after a virtual simulation. Method: An experimental study was conducted to examine various debriefing methods. Participants completed a virtual gaming simulation and were randomly assigned to one of three debriefing methods: in person, virtual, and self. Results: Within groups, students made significant knowledge and self-efficacy gains, and all groups rated their debriefing experience highly. There were no significant differences in outcomes between groups. Conclusion: There is evidence to support alternative debriefing methods beyond the traditional in-person approach after a virtual gaming simulation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Verkuyl, M., Atack, L., McCulloch, T., Liu, L., Betts, L., Lapum, J. L., … Romaniuk, D. (2018). Comparison of Debriefing Methods after a Virtual Simulation: An Experiment. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 19, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.03.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free