Proposed Framework for Conducting Clinically Relevant Translational Biomarker Research for the Diagnosis, Prognosis and Management of Sepsis

5Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Although the diagnosis of sepsis requires the identification of the three components of infection, a systemic inflammation response, and organ dysfunction, there is currently no consensus on gold-standard criteria. There are however suggested tools and tests, which have been proposed in international guidelines, including those produced by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Biomarkers play an important role in these tools and tests, and numerous heterogeneous studies have been performed to evaluate their respective clinical utility. Our review of the current practice shows that no biomarkers of infection, systemic inflammation response, organ dysfunction and sepsis are currently specifically recommended, which is probably due to the lack of standardization of studies. We therefore propose to define a framework for conducting clinically relevant translational biomarker research and seek to establish ideal criteria that can be applied to an infection, systemic inflammation response, organ dysfunction and sepsis biomarkers, which can enable early screening of sepsis, diagnosis of sepsis at the time of clinical suspicion and monitoring of sepsis treatment efficacy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ventura, F., Greub, G., Liles, W. C., & Jacob, S. T. (2024, February 1). Proposed Framework for Conducting Clinically Relevant Translational Biomarker Research for the Diagnosis, Prognosis and Management of Sepsis. Diagnostics. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14030300

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free