New insight into laboratory tests and imaging modalities for fast and accurate diagnosis of CovID-19: Alternative suggestions for routine RT-PCR and CT—A literature review

7Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The globally inimitable and unremitting outbreak of COVID-19 infection confirmed the emergency need for critical detection of human coronavirus infections. Laboratory diagnostic tests and imaging modalities are two test groups used for the detection of COVID-19. Nowadays, real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and computed tomography (CT) have been frequently utilized in the clinic. Some limitations that confront with these tests are false-negative results, tests redone for follow-up procedure, high cost, and unable to do for all patients. To overcome these limitations, modified and alternative tests must be considered. Among these tests, RdRp/Hel RT-PCR assay had the lowest diagnostic limitation and highest sensitivity and specificity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in both respiratory tract and nonrespiratory tract clinical specimens. On the other hand, lung ultrasound (LUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are CT-alternative imaging modalities for the management, screening, and follow-up of COVID-19 patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khorasani, A., Chegini, A., & Mirzaei, A. (2020). New insight into laboratory tests and imaging modalities for fast and accurate diagnosis of CovID-19: Alternative suggestions for routine RT-PCR and CT—A literature review. Canadian Respiratory Journal. Hindawi Limited. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4648307

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free