Evaluation of RSM for simulating dispersion of CO 2 cloud in flat and urban terrains

5Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Accurate and reliable computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation of pollutant dispersion is essential for protecting human health, and the choice of turbulence model is an important parameter determining the accuracy of simulation results. This paper evaluates the ability of Reyonds stress model (RSM) to predict dispersion of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) cloud, which is a typical type of heavy gas and similar to some particulate pollutants, in flat and urban terrains. The RSM simulation is conducted with stress-ω model, whereas SST k-ω two-equation model is selected as the benchmark. The simulation results are compared with the available wind tunnel measurements, and statistical performance indicators are used to obtain a comprehensive and quantitative evaluation of the performances of the two turbulence models. The results reveal that stress-ω model exhibits different capacities in flat terrain and urban terrain. Specifically, stress-ω model can present better results than SST k-ω model in flat terrain, and it performs better in the far-field region than in the near-field region. Although SST k-ω model can describe CO 2 dispersion more accurately in urban terrain, the concentration distribution reproduced by stress-ω model is still within acceptable range.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, C., Liu, L., & Tan, W. (2019). Evaluation of RSM for simulating dispersion of CO 2 cloud in flat and urban terrains. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 19(2), 390–398. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2018.09.0328

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free