Randomized trial of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin CY 216 (fraxiparine) compared with intravenous unfractionated heparin in the curative treatment of submassive pulmonary embolism: A dose-ranging study

108Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background. We compared the efficacy and safety of different dosages of a low-molecular-weight heparin, CY 216 D (Fraxiparine), in the treatment of submassive pulmonary embolism with unfractionated heparin in a prospective, randomized, dose-finding study. Methods and Results. The primary outcome was the evolution of pulmonary vascular obstruction. We enrolled 101 patients. Four patient groups were formed: standard heparin by continuous intravenous infusion (group 1) and Fraxiparine subcutaneously 400, 600, and 900 anti-Xa Institute Choay units/kg, respectively (groups 2, 3, and 4). Inclusions were stopped prematurely in groups 3 and 4 because of the incidence of major bleedings. At day 8, the improvement of the pulmonary vascular obstruction and the major bleediugs were similar in groups 1 and 2. Conclusions. The Fraxiparine dosage of 400 anti-Xa Institute Choay units/kg is as effective and safe as unfractionated heparin in the treatment of submassive pulmonary embolism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Théry, C., Simonneau, G., Meyer, G., Hélénon, O., Bridey, F., Armagnac, C., … Coquart, J. P. (1992). Randomized trial of subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin CY 216 (fraxiparine) compared with intravenous unfractionated heparin in the curative treatment of submassive pulmonary embolism: A dose-ranging study. Circulation, 85(4), 1380–1389. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.85.4.1380

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free