Emotional Markers of Disrespect: A Fourth Dimension of Perceived Political Incivility?

9Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Research has investigated emotional responses to perceived political incivility but not whether aspects of emotionality may be perceived as uncivil. When politicians display or evoke anger, they may increase democratic participation; however, because manifesting or evoking some negative emotions suggests disrespect—a central component of extant conceptualizations of political incivility—displaying anger and evoking fear and anger may be perceived as aspects of incivility. We test this using confirmatory factor analysis on a national sample of over 2,000 Americans. We find an overarching construct of perceived political incivility including not only three previously identified dimensions but also a fourth dimension reflecting negative emotions including fear and anger. Despite heterogeneity in perceived incivility, about 70% or more of respondents view behaviors including trolling and intentionally evoking anger and fear as mostly or very uncivil.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stryker, R., Conway, B. A., Bauldry, S., & Kaul, V. (2024). Emotional Markers of Disrespect: A Fourth Dimension of Perceived Political Incivility? Communication Research, 51(5), 496–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502231221926

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free