Performance assessment of methodologies for vertical stratification in native forests

6Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Vertical stratification – as well as other environmental phytosociological parameters for uneven-aged stands in forest structures – is one of the factors that regulates the amount of energy present in a forest, although it is often disregarded. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of some commonly used methodologies to characterize the vertical stratification of a forest fragment. Researchers from UESB – State University of Southwest Bahia collected data in a Seasonal Forest fragment located in the city of Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil. The standard method used in the study was the Sociological Position Method. Results were compared to six other methods: IUFRO; Vega; Longhi; Calegário; Souza and Leite; and Hasenauer. The performance of each method was assessed according to the “c” coefficient. Results of the standard method showed 954 individuals (656 dominant; 232 codominant; and 66 dominated). The “c” coefficient was found to be efficient to interpret the performance of these methods. The IUFRO Method showed the best performance when compared to the Sociological Position Methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Neto, E. N. S., de Paula, A., Tagliaferre, C., Barreto-Garcia, P. A. B., & Longue Júnior, D. (2018). Performance assessment of methodologies for vertical stratification in native forests. Ciencia Florestal, 28(4), 1583–1591. https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509835106

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free