Is an optical illusion the cause of classical bile duct injuries?

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We sought to determine if lateral–inferior traction on the Hartmann pouch could produce bile duct kinking and subsequent misinterpretation of the space on the left side of the bile duct as the hepatobiliary triangle. Once traction was applied, we measured the angle between the cystic duct and inferior gallbladder wall (hepatobiliary triangle) in 76 cases, and the angle between the common bile duct and common hepatic duct (porta hepatis “triangle”) in 41 cases. The mean angles were significantly different (hepatobiliary triangle mean 68.2°, standard deviation [SD] 16.0°, range 23–109°; porta hepatis “triangle” mean 112.0°, SD 18.4°, range 72–170°; p < 0.01). The ranges, however, overlapped in 26 cases. In many cases, lateral–inferior traction on the Hartmann pouch produced substantial kinking of the bile duct that could easily elicit the illusion that it is the hepatobiliary triangle rather than the centre of the porta hepatis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sutherland, F., Ball, C. G., Schendel, J., & Dixon, E. (2021, January 1). Is an optical illusion the cause of classical bile duct injuries? Canadian Journal of Surgery. Canadian Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1503/CJS.014019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free