Thiazole-Based Thiazolidinones as Potent Antimicrobial Agents. Design, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation

  • Haroun M
  • Tratrat C
  • Tsolaki E
  • et al.
43Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

© 2016 Bentham Science Publishers. As a part of our ongoing project on the design and synthesis of new thiazole derivatives with antimicrobial activity, fourteen new ethyl 2-(2-((E)-((Z)-5-(4-benzyliden)- 4-oxothiazolidin-2-yliden)amino-4-yl)acetates, carrying halogens, methoxy and other groups were synthesized. Compounds were tested against eight Gram positive and negative bacteria as well as eight yeasts and mold by microdilution assay. All compounds showed good activity against all bacteria tested with MIC ranging between 2.3-39.8 μmol/ml × 10-2 and MBC of 9.2-79.6 μmol/ml × 10-2. As reference drugs Ampicillin (MIC 24.8-74.4 and MBC 37.2-124.0 μmol/ml × 10-2) and Streptomycin (MIC 4,3-17.2 and MBC 8.6-51.6 μmol/ml x 10-2) were used. The best activity was observed for 4-bromo derivative. All tested compounds showed excellent antifungal activity against all fungi tested with MIC in the range between 0.3-38.6 μmol/ml × 10-2 and MFC range of 0.6-77.2 μmol/ml × 10-2, better than that of reference drugs, Ketoconazole (MIC 38.0-475.0 and MFC 95.0-570 μmol/ml × 10-2) and Bifonazole (MIC 48.0-64.0 and MFC 64.0-80.0 μmol/ml × 10-2). The best activity was observed for 3-nitro derivative. It was found that among the 5-arylidene derivatives the inhibitory effect appears to be dependent on the substitution at the benzene ring. Fourteen new ethyl 2-(2-((E)-((Z)-5-(4-benzyliden)-4-oxothiazolidin-2-yliden)amino-4-yl)acetates were synthesized and evaluated for antibacterial and antifungal activity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haroun, M., Tratrat, C., Tsolaki, E., & Geronikaki, A. (2016). Thiazole-Based Thiazolidinones as Potent Antimicrobial Agents. Design, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation. Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening, 19(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.2174/1386207319666151203002348

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free