Procedural pain in children: A qualitative study of caregiver experiences and information needs

33Citations
Citations of this article
162Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Children experience multiple painful procedures when being cared for in emergency departments (EDs). Unfortunately, evidence-based interventions to manage such pain and distress are under-utilized across EDs. Caregivers are uniquely positioned and invested to advocate for the adaptation of such evidence into practice. Our objective was to gather information from caregivers of children experiencing procedural pain in the ED to inform the development of a novel, caregiver-focused knowledge translation (KT) tool. Methods: The study design was qualitative description. Caregivers of children who underwent intravenous (IV) insertion or venipuncture in the pediatric ED at an urban tertiary care centre were interviewed. Thematic analysis was applied to the data. The TRanslating Emergency Knowledge for Kids (TREKK) Parent Advisory Group continuously informed this study, and provided input on interview guide development and piloting, data collection, analysis of the data, interpretation of the results, and development of next steps. Results: Interviews revealed four major themes: 1) source of healthcare information; 2) delivering healthcare information; 3) communication with caregivers; and 4) procedure-related anxiety and long-term effects. Caregivers most valued receiving information directly from their healthcare provider. They also expressed that healthcare providers should direct information about the procedure to their child and identified strategies to involve children in their care. Caregivers wanted to be empowered to ask informed questions of their healthcare providers. Finally, caregivers reported negative experiences with procedures for their children, occurring mainly at non-pediatric centres. Conclusions: We have identified core information needs for caregivers whose children are experiencing IV insertion or venipuncture. These results will form the foundation for the development of a KT tool that may empower caregivers to actively participate in their child's healthcare.

References Powered by Scopus

Using thematic analysis in psychology

110365Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

What's in a name? Qualitative description revisited

3154Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries

2917Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Assessing procedural pain in infants: a feasibility study evaluating a point-of-care mobile solution based on automated facial analysis

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluating the content validity of two versions of an instrument used in measuring pediatric pain knowledge and attitudes in the Ghanaian context

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Is venous blood a more reliable description of acid-base state following simulated hypo- and hyperventilation?

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shave, K., Ali, S., Scott, S. D., & Hartling, L. (2018). Procedural pain in children: A qualitative study of caregiver experiences and information needs. BMC Pediatrics, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1300-y

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 43

67%

Researcher 9

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 36

52%

Medicine and Dentistry 22

32%

Psychology 9

13%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

3%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 16

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0