The feasibility of reducing and measuring sedentary time among overweight, non-exercising office workers

96Citations
Citations of this article
134Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This study examined the feasibility of reducing free-living sedentary time (ST) and the convergent validity of various tools to measure ST. Twenty overweight/obese participants wore the activPAL (AP) (criterion measure) and ActiGraph (AG; 100 and 150 count/minute cut-points) for a 7-day baseline period. Next, they received a simple intervention targeting free-living ST reductions (7-day intervention period). ST was measured using two questionnaires following each period. ST significantly decreased from 67% of wear time (baseline period) to 62.7% of wear time (intervention period) according to AP (n = 14, P < 0.01). No other measurement tool detected a reduction in ST. The AG measures were more accurate (lower bias) and more precise (smaller confidence intervals) than the questionnaires. Participants reduced ST by ∼5%, which is equivalent to a 48-min reduction over a 16-hour waking day. These data describe ST measurement properties from wearable monitors and self-report tools to inform sample-size estimates for future ST interventions. © 2012 Sarah Kozey-Keadle et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kozey-Keadle, S., Libertine, A., Staudenmayer, J., & Freedson, P. (2012). The feasibility of reducing and measuring sedentary time among overweight, non-exercising office workers. Journal of Obesity, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/282303

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free