Diagnostic accuracy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for active tuberculosis in clinical practice at a tertiary general hospital

  • Jin W
  • Pan J
  • Miao Q
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for active tuberculosis (TB). Methods We retrospectively collected 820 samples at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University in Shanghai, China, between 1 April 2017 and 31 March 2018. They were classified into TB cases (125, 15.2%) and NOT TB cases (695, 84.8%) according to the clinical diagnosis. Specimens were evaluated by a regular clinical microbiological assay and mNGS performed in parallel. Results Sixty-one confirmed TB cases and 64 clinical TB cases were included. The overall sensitivity of mNGS was 49.6% [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 40.6–58.6%], and the specificity was 98.3% (95% CI, 96.9–99.1%), with peak sensitivities of 88.9% (95% CI, 50.7–99.4%) for lung tissue, 55.0% (95% CI, 32.0–76.2%) for bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), and 50.0% (95% CI, 32.8–67.2%) for serous fluids. The overall sensitivity of mNGS was superior to that of the culture assay (35.2%, 95% CI, 27.0–44.3), but no superior sensitivity for sputum was observed in mNGS compared with the culture assay (mNGS: 52.3%, 95% CI, 31.1–72.6%; culture: 60.9%, 95% CI, 38.8–79.5%). In clinical TB cases, mNGS detected additional positive results (40.6%, 26/64). mNGS reduced the turnaround time from 2–6 weeks to 32–36 hours. Conclusions mNGS may be a promising technology for the early auxiliary diagnosis of active TB, especially sputum-negative pulmonary TB (PTB) and tuberculous serous effusion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jin, W., Pan, J., Miao, Q., Ma, Y., Zhang, Y., Huang, Y., … Hu, B. (2020). Diagnostic accuracy of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for active tuberculosis in clinical practice at a tertiary general hospital. Annals of Translational Medicine, 8(17), 1065–1065. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-2274

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free