Structural Performance of GFRP-Wrapped Concrete Elements: Sustainable Solution for Coastal Protection

Abstract

Protecting coastal regions is crucial due to high population density and significant economic value. While numerous strategies have been proposed to mitigate scouring and protect coastal structures, existing techniques have limitations. This paper introduces a novel approach, SEAHIVE®, which enhances the performance of engineered structures by utilizing hexagonal, hollow, and perforated concrete elements externally reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP). Unlike conventional steel bars, GFRP offers superior durability and requires less maintenance, making it a sustainable solution for any riverine and coastal environment. SEAHIVE® aims to provide robust structural capacity, effective energy dissipation, and preservation of natural habitats. Although some research has addressed energy dissipation and performance in riverine and coastal contexts, the structural performance of SEAHIVE® elements has not been extensively studied. This paper evaluates SEAHIVE® elements reinforced with externally bonded GFRP longitudinal strips and pretensioned GFRP transverse wraps. Testing full-size specimens under compression and flexure revealed that failure occurred when the pretensioned GFRP wraps failed in compression tests and when longitudinal GFRP strips slipped in flexure tests. Strength capacity was notably improved by anchoring the GFRP strips at both ends. These findings underscore the potential of the SEAHIVE® system to significantly enhance the durability and performance of coastal and riverine protection structures. FEM simulations provided critical insights into the failure mechanism and validated the experimental findings. In fact, by comparing FEM model results for cases before and after applying GFRP wraps under the same compression load, it was found that maximum stresses at crack locations were significantly reduced due to compression forces resulting from the presence of pretensioned GFRP wraps. Similarly, FEM model analysis on flexure samples showed that the most vulnerable regions corresponded to the locations where cracks started during testing.