The scientific publication landscape is changing quickly, with an enormous increase in options and models. Articles can be published in a complex variety of journals that differ in their presentation format (online-only or in-print), editorial organizations that maintain them (commercial and/or society-based), editorial handling (academic or professional editors), editorial board composition (academic or professional), payment options to cover editorial costs (open access or pay-to-read), indexation, visibility, branding, and other aspects. Additionally, online submissions of non-revised versions of manuscripts prior to seeking publication in a peer-reviewed journal (a practice known as pre-printing) are a growing trend in biological sciences. In this changing landscape, researchers in biochemistry and molecular biology must re-think their priorities in terms of scientific output dissemination. The evaluation processes and institutional funding for scientific publications should also be revised accordingly. This article presents the results of discussions within the Department of Biochemistry, University of São Paulo, on this subject.
Baptista, M. S., Alves, M. J. M., Arantes, G. M., Armelin, H. A., Augusto, O., Baldini, R. L., … Kowaltowski, A. J. (2019). Where do we aspire to publish? A position paper on scientific communication in biochemistry and molecular biology. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 52(9). https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-431x20198935